[IAU logo]

[URSI logo]

[Karl Jansky at his antenna]
Jansky and his antenna. NRAO/AUI image

[Reber's Wheaton antenna]
Reber's Wheaton antenna. NRAO/AUI image

[Dover Heights]
Dover Heights. Photo supplied by Wayne Orchiston

[4C telescope]
4C telescope. NRAO/AUI image

[Ewen and horn antenna]
Ewen and the horn antenna, Harvard, 1951. Photo supplied by Ewen

[Dwingeloo, 1956]
Dwingeloo, 1956. ASTRON image

[Jocelyn Bell Burnell and Cambridge antenna used in pulsar discovery]
Jocelyn Bell Burnell and Cambridge antenna used in pulsar discovery. Bell Burnell image

[Lovell Telescope at Jodrell Bank]
Lovell Telescope at Jodrell Bank. Image © Anthony Holloway

[Wilson, Penzias, and Bell Labs horn antenna]
Wilson, Penzias, and Bell Labs horn antenna. Bell Labs image

[6-m Millimeter Radio Telescope in Mitaka, Japan]
6-m Mm Telescope in Mitaka, Japan. NAOJ image


Peter A.G. Scheuer

(Contributed by John Peacock)


Peter Scheuer, 1972.

Peter Scheuer, 1972. (Credit: Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge)


Peter August Georg Scheuer (31 March 1930 - 21 January 2001) was a German-born British astrophysicist and radio astronomer, who made major contributions in theory and observation to extragalactic astronomy and cosmology. In particular, he created the P(D) method that allowed number counts of extragalactic radio sources to be estimated in the presence of source confusion; he independently proposed the Gunn-Peterson trough as a means of detecting intergalactic neutral hydrogen; he produced some of the earliest arguments for ejection of relativistic jets from the centres of active galaxies and quasars.

Peter was born in Frankfurt am Main, of Jewish ancestry, and his family emigrated to the UK in 1938, where he eventually studied physics at the University of Cambridge. In 1951, he remained in Cambridge to join the radio astronomy research group of Sir Martin Ryle, working as Ryle's PhD student. He was eventually given a position on the tenured teaching staff of the Cavendish Laboratory, as an assistant director of research, in 1963. At the same time, he became a Fellow of Peterhouse. He was subsequently promoted to Reader in 1992, and remained at Cambridge for the rest of his career. He married Jane Elizabeth Morford, and they had a daughter, Suzi.

Peter made a definitive contribution to the 1950s controversy over radio source counts. The early radio surveys claimed a large excess of faint sources, in conflict with the predictions of the steady-state cosmology. This issue was the subject of heated debate between Ryle and Sir Fred Hoyle. One difficulty was that the early surveys were confusion limited: what appeared to be a single faint source was often a blend of several still fainter objects, thus boosting the counts. Peter solved this problem by developing the P(D) method, showing how the counts were boosted and allowing the correct counts to be extracted - and demonstrating that they were still in conflict with steady-state predictions. The P(D) method remains widely used in astronomical imaging surveys, as testified by the continuing citations to Peter's 1957 paper.

Peter developed an interest in the intergalactic medium and realised that the spectra of quasars offered an extremely sensitive probe of neutral gas: even a neutral fraction of order a part in 100,000 would be sufficient to cause noticeable absorption of the rest-frame UV continuum shortwards of the Lyman-alpha emission line. At the time, this set only an upper limit to the density - but as quasars were found at higher redshifts, the predicted trough was detected. This is now known as the Gunn-Peterson trough after the two American astronomers who made the same prediction, but Peter invented the idea independently and published it at the same time (Scheuer 1965).

But the majority of Peter's research works relate to his longstanding efforts as a theorist seeking to explain the powerful emission from the radio galaxies being detected by Ryle's radio telescopes. These were often of a double morphology, and Peter showed in 1974 that this could be accounted for if the energy of the radiating electrons was built up by energy supplied from the central galaxy. In due course, it would be demonstrated that the central source of energy was a supermassive black hole and the connecting jets would be imaged directly; but Peter's early analysis was general and independent of this detailed evidence.

The first direct evidence for relativistic jets in active galaxies came when the high-brightness cores of quasars were seen via very long baseline interferometry to be ejecting blobs of emitting plasma with apparent transverse velocities greater than that of light. This superluminal motion makes sense if the jets move with high Lorentz factors and are directed nearly along the line of sight. Scheuer & Readhead (1979) realised that such motion would be accompanied by relativistic beaming and enhancement of the apparent flux density, leading observational selection to favour jets aligned with the line of sight. This then raised the question of the appearance of objects where the jets were directed transversely, and Scheuer & Readhead proposed the first unified scheme for radio sources, suggesting that the misaligned objects would be radio-quiet quasars. It is now believed that this is not correct, and that the misaligned objects would be radio galaxies. But this original idea of beaming-based unification was immensely influential.

Peter died at his home in West Wickham, Cambridgeshire, on 21 January 2001. He was much mourned by all who had known him: a deep physicist who always had the time to talk at length to students about ideas in the subject - usually accompanied by characteristic outbursts of booming laughter. Peter often approached things in a uniquely individual way, designed to make students think for themselves rather than displaying his brilliance with a ready-made quick answer. His influence spread far and wide through extragalactic astronomy, but he was utterly lacking in ego and self-promotion, which perhaps helps explain why his achievements did not always receive the public recognition that they merited.

References:

  • Scheuer (1957) Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 53, 764
  • Scheuer (1965) Nature, 207, 963
  • Scheuer (1974) MNRAS, 166, 513
  • Scheuer & Readhead (1979) Nature, 277, 182

Modified on Wednesday, 05-Mar-2025 13:36:40 EST by Ellen Bouton, Archivist (Questions or feedback)